ext_160172 ([identity profile] brendala.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] 1word1day2014-08-21 02:00 am
Entry tags:

Thursday word: "Brokeback"

Most people think of this movie when they hear the word “brokeback”:

brokeback_mountain_xlg
aka ‘gay cowboys eating pudding’


But among the online comic book fan community, its taken on a new meaning. Its used to describe the ridiculous poses that female characters are often contorted into. More specifically, its used to describe the poses that break the rules of basic human anatomy just to show off a woman’s boobs and buttocks at the same time. For example:




…and more humorous examples from actual comics can be found at the Escher Girls blog.

FYI, if you ever see a comic with a brokeback pose on the cover, chances are it’s a crappy piece of softcore porn and you’re better off not buying it.

[identity profile] kimuro.livejournal.com 2014-08-21 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
FYI, if you ever see a comic with a brokeback pose on the cover, chances are it’s a crappy piece of softcore porn and you’re better off not buying it.

You're talking about any mainstream comic book with a woman on the cover.

Ha, ha! Hey, I recognize that elf!!

[identity profile] theidolhands.livejournal.com 2014-08-22 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, while I sympathize with [livejournal.com profile] matsyendra's retort and am guilty of loving some pretty cheesy stuff -- I can also admit to be oblivious to some of it and having a sense of humor about the exploitation aspects.

[identity profile] theidolhands.livejournal.com 2014-08-22 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Good point!

[identity profile] lucretiasheart.livejournal.com 2014-08-21 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I love it!!

Great word!

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] matsyendra.livejournal.com 2014-08-21 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
While it's hardly limited to females, comic book characters are often super-human, and comic books are not intended to be realistic. For example, the heavily T & A Heavy Metal was clearly fantasy, and published work by Guido Crepax, H.R. Giger, and Milo Manara. So I would hesitate to call it "crappy". Nevermind, unrealistic and idealized portrayals of human figures is as old as art itself.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] matsyendra.livejournal.com 2014-08-22 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Throughout my studies as a yoga teacher, I've seen some extremely flexible people in real life. Regardless, comic book action is often over-dramatized with bodies bent in exaggerated ways.

While making people look sexy is hardly unique to comic books. Both male and female characters are generally presented as powerful looking and unrealistic physical objects. Look at the X-Men. Almost all the mutants are mesomorphs, regardless of whether or not their abilities have anything to do physical strength. Notice how Doctor Xavier fills out his suit, sitting in his wheelchair. Magneto, an extreme intellectual that moves metal with his mind, was often drawn as if he were a super-athlete. There are exceptions. The Blob is fat. Shadowcat is skinny. But mostly, the main characters in comic book are drawn in skin-tight clothes with overly defined muscles. Which is not conventionally feminine (or the way women are typically drawn in sexy cheesecake art). So the major boobage was a way to make female characters -- who were otherwise built like cornerbacks -- look obviously female. Although I can see how it might look silly. It's merely a motif of the genre.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] theidolhands.livejournal.com 2014-08-25 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
You could argue that their superior appearance as humans is a result of their mutated genetic code, they are referred to as Homo sapiens superior after all, and while a dominant genetic trait it's not an exclusive one either (which is also a common deviation within the mutant universe). Nightcrawler and Longshot are freakishly flexible as part of their SUPERHERO POWERS, although neither is on covers to put them into sexual or brokeback positions or for the sake of titillation.

Arguing that skin-tight clothing or idealized bodies is the same as sexually exploiting female characters to the point of laugh-ability seems an analogous argument though. We openly mock bad muscle structures too, which Liefeld is famous for among his "brokeback" work, although this does not put the male character into a servile position, that society itself already foolishly endorses around the globe; naturally those suffering under this stigma are more sensitive to such images. Really, the only valid argument one could make is, "It sells, it turns me on, and I don't really care."


Edited 2014-08-25 23:16 (UTC)
(deleted comment)

I'll just leave this here:

[identity profile] theidolhands.livejournal.com 2014-08-22 07:29 am (UTC)(link)
http://thehawkeyeinitiative.com/

That totally makes sense.

[identity profile] theidolhands.livejournal.com 2014-08-22 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I realize that The Hawkeye Initiative is well known at this point, but I couldn't resist mentioning it again just in case. I'm impressed that a few males have recently taken photos of themselves as Hawkeye posed oddly. ha, ha, ha!
med_cat: (SH education never ends)

[personal profile] med_cat 2014-08-26 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Interesting meaning the word has acquired...and your illustrations are very well done.